If you’re a revenge porn victim, consider this free, helpful legal guide

14 02 2017
Without My Consent, a San Francisco-based advocacy organization that aims to help victims of revenge porn, has released a slew of new resources this week in an attempt to make seeking justice easier for victims.

The new materials, dubbed “Something Can Be Done! Guide,” provides a step-by-step guide for victims. It provides concrete measures that they can take, including evidence preservation, copyright registration, restraining orders, and takedown requests to Internet companies—many of which don’t require the often-costly services of a lawyer. (Without My Consent’s efforts are reminiscent of Nolo, a decades-old do-it-yourself legal publisher.)

guide is here: http://withoutmyconsent.org/resources

more

The content in this post was found at https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/02/if-youre-a-revenge-porn-victim-consider-this-free-helpful-legal-guide/and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Using Scraper to Harvest Records Isn’t Fraudulent Access Under CFAA–Fidlar v. LPS

18 01 2017

Fidlar works with counties to digitize and index land records. It also makes available a software client (Laredo) that allows end users to access these records. Billing is handled by the counties, and counties have monthly access plans. The counties also provide accounts (and passwords) to end users. The plans are usually time-based but include separate “print fees” so that people who print a record for off-line viewing have to pay additional fees. Fidlar’s EULA did not impose any specific restrictions on use of Laredo. As the court notes, the EULA says a user may “use . . . any portion of the software for any purpose”. [I didn’t double check this but it seems odd for a EULA to contain broadly permissive language like this.]

LPS wanted to aggregate the data underlying the county records, so it built a harvester to mimic the calls Laredo would send to the database. Using this process, while logged in using county-provided passwords, LPS downloaded a massive quantity of county records. (The precise relationship between being logged in and accessing the records is not clear factually.) It then sent these records offshore for processing and extracted the underlying data. A county alerted Fidlar to the fact that LPS was paying fees but not logging any time. It sued LPS under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and state anti-hacking law. The district court dismissed Fidlar’s claims at summary judgment. (Blog post on the district court ruling here: “Company That Facilitates Digital Access to Public Records Uses CFAA to Block Scraper”.) The district court case involved a host of issues, including alleged contractual interference by Fidlar (who contacted the counties to try to disrupt LPS’s access), defamation claims, the public records status of the data, and whether Fidlar and the counties could gate the data in this manner consistent with public records statute. These are all interesting issues in their own right, but Fidlar’s appeal only focuses on the CFAA issues.

more

 

Case citation: Fidlar Techs v. LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc., No. 15-1830 (7th Cir. Jan. 21, 2016) [pdf]

The content in this post was found at http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/03/using-scraper-to-harvest-records-isnt-fraudulent-access-under-cfaa-fidlar-v-lpr.htm and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Top 10 Internet Law Developments of 2015 (Forbes Cross-Post)

16 01 2017

10) Cars as computers.

9) FTC as privacy and security enforcer.

8) High stakes copyright battles.

7) Who is an employee online?

6) The Ninth Circuit saves itself from wrecking the Internet (twice!).

5) Stronger geographic borders on the Internet.

4) Major sites crack down on offensive content.

3) Ad blocker wars.

2) Ashley Madison database breach.

1) Presidential politics and Silicon Valley as scourge and savior.

more

The content in this post was found at http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/02/top-10-internet-law-developments-of-2015-forbes-cross-post.htm and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Jury heaps another $25M in damages on Gawker for publishing Hogan sex tape

10 04 2016

Things have gone from bad to worse for Gawker Media, as a Florida jury trial over its publication of a sex tape concludes.

The same jury that ordered Gawker Media to pay $115 million on Friday for violating the privacy of Terry Bollea, better known as professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, has heaped on an extra $25 million in punitive damages. The six-person jury said Gawker should pay an additional $15 million, while company founder and CEO Nick Denton was hit with an extra $10 million, according to a Reuters report from the courtroom.

 

more

The content in this post was found at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/03/jury-heaps-another-25m-in-damages-on-gawker-for-publishing-hogan-sex-tape/ and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Gawker begins appeal of $140M Hulk Hogan sex-tape verdict

7 04 2016
The online news and gossip site Gawker has begun the process of appealing the $140 million verdict a jury ordered it to pay last month for publishing a sex tape of Terry Bollea, better known as former pro-wrestler Hulk Hogan.

more

The content in this post was found at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/04/gawker-begins-appeal-of-140m-hulk-hogan-sex-tape-verdict/ and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.